A look inside a Kindergarten Grade 1 classroom in Canada

Tag: stylus

Discussions with an Occupational Therapist

This past Monday, I invited Alison Stewart from Aspire! Occupational Therapy & Coaching LTD to our class video chat. I’ve known Alison for 5+ years and she has been instrumental in growing my knowledge base about developing the muscle strength necessary to print in kindergarten aged students. She went above and beyond answering our questions about fine motor skills while providing us with practical tools and apps available to use in the classroom.

She started with a list of reasons why a student could be struggling with printing. These include lack of physical strength or coordination, a visual perception problem, the fear of failure, or an individual disorder such as FASD, ADD, or ASD, along with others. She made it clear that very few apps actually help improve motor skills but rather improve visual perception and spatial motor skills.

A few of my colleagues, including megc, are evaluating various apps to use in the classroom. Without spending hours completing individual research, we have come together to evaluate apps to recommend to each other. Alison was able to provide us with steps to better appraise printing apps. She stated that apps should have the opportunity for repetition of at least 10 times, with an increasing level of difficulty while paying attention to accuracy, complexity, and speed. The app should have the opportunity for the child to view the letter, number, or shape being created. It should have the ability for the child to imitate the letter using manipulatives. Then the child should trace the letter. While looking at a model, the child can then copy it. Finally, the child can print the letter, number, or shape independently. This is good practice for traditional non-tech related activities as well.

She listed a few apps including Osmo. I have Osmo at my school and in a recent PLC meeting, I have been able to arrange getting one Osmo set for my classroom. I am looking forward to trying this out as after listening to Alison, I think this app could support many learning outcomes in my K/1 classroom. Alison agreed that LetterSchool was the most universal app for teaching printing. I have recently begun using this app with one particular student in my class. Like Alison suggested, he uses a stylus with a pencil grip. I am hoping to see an improvement in his skills. I have asked my LSC to order a few of the stylus’ that Alison recommended as well. Some videos about other apps she spoke about are: Dexteria or Dexteria Jr., Button Board, Cut the Buttons, and Bugs and Buttons.

Although we are a participating in a technology class, Alison reminded us of the things apps cannot provide our students and what our students are lacking when they enter kindergarten. She finds that children have a harder time moving objects from one end of their hand to the tips of their fingers. Touch screen technology does not provide an opportunity to use tactile discrimination as the child is only touching a smooth piece of glass. Apps cannot provide the users with the experience of moving 3D objects while moving their fingers individually.

The most interesting part of our discussion for me was the concern about lack of hand dominance in children entering kindergarten. I have usually not worried about this and assured parents that usually by the end of kindergarten, their child would have picked a dominant hand. I was unaware that children usually pick a dominant hand by the time they are 3 years old. In my experience, the children who have not picked a dominate hand usually end up being left-handed. However, Alison noted that there could be other issues such as a coordination problem or an inability to cross the midline of the body, highlighting a more significant issue of the two brain hemispheres not communicating with each other. Or perhaps it is because of the less concerning reason and is due to lack of experience manipulating objects in their hands. Over the years, Alison has given me various ideas to help children cross their midline. These include dancing, touching opposite sides of the body in different spots, making figures 8s with paint on a vertical board or paint easel, or group passing games like hot potato. I have not yet taught the capital letter I or T, but when I do, I will be paying extra attention to those who cannot make the line straight across as this is an excellent example of a deficit in crossing the midline.

I am looking forward to reading some of the articles Alison shared and reviewing the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire from DCDQ.ca.  You can find the questionnaire and administration manual for free of charge on their website. Unfortunately, the Little DCDQ (designed for 3-4 year old children) is not free.

I was very pleased with the knowledge Alison shared and felt her presentation was useful to classroom teachers and early childhood educators. She was able to provide research-based information and practical tools to support the fine motor need of children today.

References:

Alison Stewart, Aspire! Occupational Therapy & Coaching LTD

https://www.letterschool.org

https://www.playosmo.com/en-ca/

www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq8Vxkt__Qo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzAe2MQNMGw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyTNJ-K2__w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoHG-XRptE0

www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJJx08WKo1w

https://www.dcdq.ca

The Digital Pen: A New Tool Children Will Need to Know How to Use?

Before reading this article “Does handwriting on a tablet screen affect students’ graphomotor execution? A comparison between Grades Two and Nine” by Denis Alamargot and Marie-France Morin (2015), I had to make sure I knew exactly what ‘graphomotor’ meant. I knew it had something to do with motor skills and an output of some kind. Google brought up this definition from https://www.specialeducationalneeds.co.uk/graphomotor-skills.html

“Graphomotor Skills are a combination of cognitive, perceptual and motor skills which enable a person to write. A child with Graphomotor problems will find writing difficult because there is detachment between their thoughts and their ability to express them through writing.”

The beginning of the article reviews studies done to compare the effectiveness of keyboarding and the pros and cons of keyboarding for children. Alamargot and Morin explain how keyboarding is less efficient in three ways:

  1. it forces the participant to shift between the display and the keyboard
  2. the writer does not need to form the shape of the letter when using a keyboard and therefore “does not involve any graphomotor processing” (2015) The authors also note other studies which found the action of creating the letters “has an effect on reading as the additional motor encoding that occurs during letter formation has been shown to promote the recognition of these letters, both in kindergarten children (Longcamp, Zerbato-Poudou, & Velay. 2005) and in adults (Longcamp, Boucard, Gilhodes, & Velay. 2006).” (Alamargot and Morin. 2015)
  3. using a keyboard uses too many of the brain’s resources, by looking for the key, that the child’s writing suffers

Photo by Lucélia Ribeiro CC BY-SA 2.0

The authors go on to explain how handwriting skills are built over time and how one can see the changes as children grow and acquire the control needed to handwrite. They use other studies to establish what the brain does when handwriting. Chartrel and Vinter (2005) discovered that when visual feedback is removed, children return to their propriokinesthetic feedback (how we know or sense our body is moving without looking at the body part). This means that they pushed down harder on the writing instrument, made large letters and write the letters faster. Numerous other studies identified by Alamargot and Morin, detected the differences between proficient adults handwriting on various surfaces (high friction verses low friction) and using a variety of different pen tip types. The results of these studies show how adults have strategies in order to maintain control of the writing instrument while handwriting on different surfaces.

For the experiment, the researchers used a tablet, a Wacom InkPen with no ink and another Wacom InkPen with a ballpoint tip. They also used a piece of paper which was put on top of the tablet. They used Eye and PenĂą software to record information about the pen such as where it was and its pressure, as well as the instructions for the experiment and the writing areas. The students were not given a time limit to finish the tasks, which were writing their full name and the alphabet on the tablet and the piece of paper in top of the tablet.

The researchers found that letter legibility “was significantly lower on the screen than on paper.” (Alamargot and Morin, 2015) In all four interest areas, the researchers found that the surface played a large role in the end result. More pen pressure was used when using the plastic tipped pen in both grade two and nine students. Grade nine student applied even more pressure. The letter size increased and the distance that the pen moved was farther on the tablet. The students used the pen faster on the tablet although grade nine students used it faster than the grade two students. Finally, the pauses where greater when using the tablet. Grade two students paused longer than the grade nines. Pausing is when one stops to check the way their writing instrument is moving to correct the formation.

In 2015, this was one of the first studies of its kind. Since then, a variety of tablet pens or styluses are available. The authors suggest other studies would be useful to see if surface textures or different pen tips would benefit students. When I find out that students use a tablet at home, I often suggest they use a stylus instead of their finger. The styluses that I am thinking of are the ones with the rubber ends not the hard-plastic ones. I have never asked a parent which type they use but after reading this article and now understanding the science behind the friction involved in handwriting, I will be suggesting the rubber tipped styluses. Since this study was completed a few years ago, perhaps I will look for newer studies comparing different types of styluses.

This study has made me question my thoughts on practicing printing on the tablet. If students are using more pressure, writing letters faster, their legibility is lower, and the letters are bigger than if they were practicing on paper, is it providing enough benefits to outweigh these negatives? Maybe age is significant? This study was with grade two students who already learned letter formation; most kindergarten students are just beginning to learn letter formation. As a kindergarten teacher, I am looking for the general shape, correct pencil grip, and correct starting point compared to actual legibility. My students are encouraged to go slow for more fine motor control. By the end of kindergarten, I aim for them to know where the letters sit on the line but if they aren’t there yet, that’s okay. Now that I am also teaching grade one, the legibility and position on the line is focused on more frequently. My grade one students don’t need to practice printing on the tablet but is it a skill they will need?

As shown by other studies, adults have greater motor control and can adjust to the textures they are handwriting on. How often do we handwrite on tablet-like technology? Occasionally, I will sign my name for a credit card purchase on a tablet, but I can’t even think of another time I use a tablet to handwrite. My husband, however, uses his tablet almost every time he meets a new client. As a real estate agent, he has numerous contracts and documents that he and his clients need to sign. Before purchasing his tablet, he printed these out on paper resulting in an average use of 23 sheets of paper! Now, he uses an Apple Pencil and stores his documents digitally.

I think that yes, students will need to learn how to handwrite on a tablet or software will have to be created to decode our illegible handwriting and convert it to text. (I believe this is already available but I’m not sure of its ease of use.) Depending on your career choice, you will have more or less opportunity to use handwriting on a tablet. Tablets are engrained in our society now and are becoming more popular than laptops.  Perhaps tablet handwriting will eventually become a “basic” tool that we will need to teach regularly or perhaps we will move past handwriting and move toward voice commands, also an increasing technological tool.

References:

Alamargot, D., & Morin, M. (2015). Does handwriting on a tablet screen affect students’ graphomotor execution? A comparison between grades two and nine.Human Movement Science, 44, 32-41.

https://www.specialeducationalneeds.co.uk/graphomotor-skills.html

https://www.apple.com/ca/shop/product/MK0C2AM/A/apple-pencil-1st-generation

www.wacom.com/en-kr/products/stylus/bamboo-duo